hetalvn
09-19 05:07 PM
hi
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
wallpaper ClimateP: A gas station
pointlesswait
07-21 08:38 PM
In form 157, box 17..
They ask list all colleges youhave attended or attend..
I have my MS (5 yrs back)
am currently enrolled in part time program..shoudl i give my current school info.
similarly in box 32 and 33..form 156
if i enter current employer is it ok to enter school name in 33...
> will it matter if my current enrollment is not in the same field as my previous???
anyone in the same boat???
They ask list all colleges youhave attended or attend..
I have my MS (5 yrs back)
am currently enrolled in part time program..shoudl i give my current school info.
similarly in box 32 and 33..form 156
if i enter current employer is it ok to enter school name in 33...
> will it matter if my current enrollment is not in the same field as my previous???
anyone in the same boat???
Jorajapbak
08-09 07:23 PM
HI!! I'm Aj ( more like Ahmet Jorayev). I was a student at the Georgia Military College. Unfortunately, due to lack of my personal funds, i lost my position of a student at GMC. Since January of this year i was not attending school because of exclusion. College informed of returning in Spring 2010 however they denied it later on. Currently I'm in deep depression because of losing my Academic and Immigration Status!!
IN order to reinstate I-20 visa i had to attend college. Sarcastic thing about this i had only 6month left to graduate.
Any advises or stories you can share please, help out!!
They have our future in their hands and instead of supporting,they disgrace us!!
Sincerely,
AJ
P.s. All payments for college comes straight from my pocket and no vehicle transportation either, just bicycle
IN order to reinstate I-20 visa i had to attend college. Sarcastic thing about this i had only 6month left to graduate.
Any advises or stories you can share please, help out!!
They have our future in their hands and instead of supporting,they disgrace us!!
Sincerely,
AJ
P.s. All payments for college comes straight from my pocket and no vehicle transportation either, just bicycle
2011 at a gas station with out
sdrblr
11-27 10:34 PM
This is such an open ended question. It will be very easy to answer if you can add few lines about your background, affordability and qualification(like GRE etc). If not the school names will be all over the place from MIT to the ABC University....as the word "Good School" is very subjective.
more...
nomi
12-28 03:58 PM
Hi , My wife is on h4 visa and I want to file H1B for her and she has It experience of 3 years .Please guide whats the procedure .
It should be same the way you get your H1 visa.
It should be same the way you get your H1 visa.
tinkugadu
10-26 09:20 PM
I am a person from SOuth India and i have been in US for the last four years and i came to US on F-1 and then changed to H-1B.
Am i eligible to apply at Delhi consulate for the H-1B stamping. This is my first H-1B stamping.
Am i eligible to apply at Delhi consulate for the H-1B stamping. This is my first H-1B stamping.
more...
ups
06-15 01:27 PM
I find the posts where people get layoff after 6 months and use AC21
2010 Hispanic Cartoon Gas Attendant
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
more...
amnak
05-09 08:35 AM
hi
i have been offered a job at my current research centre where i worked as a student. I want to go back to my home country. The job can be done online and does not require physical presence in the USA. Will i still need an OPT? or can they employ me as an international worker? if they wmploy me as an international consultant then what are the ramifications for teh company? wht is the legal procedure? will they have to pay taxes more etc?
Please help
i have been offered a job at my current research centre where i worked as a student. I want to go back to my home country. The job can be done online and does not require physical presence in the USA. Will i still need an OPT? or can they employ me as an international worker? if they wmploy me as an international consultant then what are the ramifications for teh company? wht is the legal procedure? will they have to pay taxes more etc?
Please help
hair Ah Yes, the Patriotism of the Shell Gas Station and some Cartoon Dead Pig Ad
truthinspector
12-23 01:52 PM
I am a July filer who has been working with his company for 5 years on H1. I have an offer to switch jobs and I am contemplating using EAD (I renewed it in 08,just never used it).
The new employer has verified my status using e-Verify. What surprised me is that , as soon as the verification was done, my existing employer called me and started asking me if I was planning to use the EAD and if they can do anything to alleviate my concerns about my compensation etc.
There is not way my current employer would know about my intentions since I maintained the confidentiality.
Does anyone know if e-Verify informs the current employer somehow? Do they receive a call from USCIS for any verification? Could this be a matter of concern?.
The new employer has verified my status using e-Verify. What surprised me is that , as soon as the verification was done, my existing employer called me and started asking me if I was planning to use the EAD and if they can do anything to alleviate my concerns about my compensation etc.
There is not way my current employer would know about my intentions since I maintained the confidentiality.
Does anyone know if e-Verify informs the current employer somehow? Do they receive a call from USCIS for any verification? Could this be a matter of concern?.
more...
akshayae
09-10 04:43 PM
Folks,
Members from the DC area we have a meeting room/Conference room set up where we can meet up at the Chantilly public library (Virginia)
The meeting room is booked from 6 pm to 7.30 pm for Wednesday September 12 th 2007.
The address for Chantilly Regional Library is
Conference Room
4000 Stringfellow Rd
Chantilly, VA 20151-2628
703-502-3883
Date and Time
Wednesday September 12 th 2007.
Timing 6 pm to 7.30 pm
We look forward to meeting you at Chantilly Regional Library
Members from the DC area we have a meeting room/Conference room set up where we can meet up at the Chantilly public library (Virginia)
The meeting room is booked from 6 pm to 7.30 pm for Wednesday September 12 th 2007.
The address for Chantilly Regional Library is
Conference Room
4000 Stringfellow Rd
Chantilly, VA 20151-2628
703-502-3883
Date and Time
Wednesday September 12 th 2007.
Timing 6 pm to 7.30 pm
We look forward to meeting you at Chantilly Regional Library
hot Gas / Fuel Station with
man-woman-and-gc
04-20 06:20 PM
Hi,
My brother is coming to USA on L1 visa.
His wife has a valid H1-B stamped. However, her employer cannot send her to US for the next 6-7 months.
Can she come to US on L2 and then transfer her H1-B if whe finds a job here in US? Or will her H1-B get immidiately cancelled as soon as she enters US on L2?
Thanks.
My brother is coming to USA on L1 visa.
His wife has a valid H1-B stamped. However, her employer cannot send her to US for the next 6-7 months.
Can she come to US on L2 and then transfer her H1-B if whe finds a job here in US? Or will her H1-B get immidiately cancelled as soon as she enters US on L2?
Thanks.
more...
house gas station in Orlando,
crazy_apple
07-14 05:24 PM
Hello,
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2008
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2008
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
tattoo A new gas station opened in a
nlssubbu
12-17 02:43 PM
My current AP expires on July 30, 2008. I am planning to apply for renewal in Jan or Feb 2008, which is 6 months prior to expiration. I understand that nowadays it takes more than 3 months for approval.
In case of emergency, Can I travel to India with my current AP while AP renewal petition is pending?.
Thanks for your help.
I do not foresee any problem in using your current AP, if your travel time is well within it's period.
In case of emergency, Can I travel to India with my current AP while AP renewal petition is pending?.
Thanks for your help.
I do not foresee any problem in using your current AP, if your travel time is well within it's period.
more...
pictures abutting a gas station.
lazycis
09-25 09:31 AM
Not a problem.
dresses Labels: stations, world
goel_ar
03-23 03:36 PM
Good news. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) recently issued guidance on the new H-1B amendment that limits Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) recipients� ability to hire H-1B workers. The USCIS confirmed that the new H-1B amendment does not apply to H-1B extensions for current employees with the same employer.
"EAWA does not apply to H-1B petitions seeking to change the status of a
beneficiary already working for the employer in another work-authorized
category. It also does not apply to H-1B petitions seeking an extension
of stay for a current employee with the same employer."
"EAWA does not apply to H-1B petitions seeking to change the status of a
beneficiary already working for the employer in another work-authorized
category. It also does not apply to H-1B petitions seeking an extension
of stay for a current employee with the same employer."
more...
makeup 3: Gas Station Stop
baldev.thakur
03-02 09:39 PM
Hi Folks
My wife was working in India all this time and I am in US. H1 expires end of 2010. I believe I used up my extension .
I got my EAD and AP already after I filed for my 485 under Eb2.
My Question is , how long can she go on H4 ? Only till my H1. If she comes to US on H4 can I file her EAD or do I have to wait for the category to be current to do so .
If its not possible to get her and EAD , and her H4 expires in 2010 ( assuming that her H4 is commensurate with my H1 Life span ) then what options do I have so that she is in status .
Please advise.
Thanks
Thakur
My wife was working in India all this time and I am in US. H1 expires end of 2010. I believe I used up my extension .
I got my EAD and AP already after I filed for my 485 under Eb2.
My Question is , how long can she go on H4 ? Only till my H1. If she comes to US on H4 can I file her EAD or do I have to wait for the category to be current to do so .
If its not possible to get her and EAD , and her H4 expires in 2010 ( assuming that her H4 is commensurate with my H1 Life span ) then what options do I have so that she is in status .
Please advise.
Thanks
Thakur
girlfriend interface at a gas station
kashr
07-05 09:01 PM
Hello all,
My wife's labor has been stuck for 2 years ( she got an RFE ). Her company lawyers arent too helpful and asked us to just wait. Wanted to know, what steps one can take to try to figure out what is happening.
Thanks,
Adi
My wife's labor has been stuck for 2 years ( she got an RFE ). Her company lawyers arent too helpful and asked us to just wait. Wanted to know, what steps one can take to try to figure out what is happening.
Thanks,
Adi
hairstyles The BTTF3 Texaco gas station
kopra
06-05 10:51 AM
Yes, your current & past paystubs(Primary H1B holder) are needed to grant H4 Visa for spouse. H4 is a dependent visa and is granted based on the primary H1B visa holder's status. In case of transfer from H1B to H4, his paystubs are also needed to proove that he was in legal status during this time.
Hi friends,
If I apply for my husband's H4, do we need to show my past paystubs?
Or will my husband's H1 information, like his employment verification, I-94, and H1B approval be enough?
Please advise....thanks!
Hi friends,
If I apply for my husband's H4, do we need to show my past paystubs?
Or will my husband's H1 information, like his employment verification, I-94, and H1B approval be enough?
Please advise....thanks!
speddi
07-11 05:05 PM
Hi,
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
Pram777
08-27 10:36 AM
My PD is Jun 2008 and my I140 is approved in April 2009 in EB2. My employer and lawyer did not give me any paperwork regarding Labor or I140 so I know details about Ad, Job Title or Description and stuff like that. If I want to transfer my H1 and keep the Priority Date, how can I know these details. Will it be a problem if I dont have these details.
Thank you
Thank you
No comments:
Post a Comment